From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Rafia Sabih <rafia(dot)pghackers(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Improve default partition |
Date: | 2019-08-20 20:50:05 |
Message-ID: | 20190820205005.GA25823@alvherre.pgsql |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2019-Aug-20, Rafia Sabih wrote:
> This does not sound very convenient. I was thinking of having some
> mechanism for such insertions which automatically creates a default
> partition and gives a notice for the user to know that it is going to
> the default partition. Basically, always having a default partition.
> After all default is something that remains there by default, isn't
> it?
There are shortcomings to having a default partition, so I don't think
this would be an universally welcome feature.
I think auto-creation of partitions might be useful in some cases, but
not by default since there are caveats (possibility of deadlocks) and
not of the default partition.
The major problem I see with the default partition is that there's no
way to create a partition that overlaps existing contents of the default
partition, short of blocking everyone.
--
Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andres Freund | 2019-08-20 21:16:50 | Re: Inadequate executor locking of indexes |
Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2019-08-20 20:47:41 | Re: Fix typos and inconsistencies for HEAD (take 11) |