| From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | no default hash partition |
| Date: | 2019-08-06 22:27:35 |
| Message-ID: | 20190806222735.GA9535@alvherre.pgsql |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Given the discussion starting at
https://postgr.es/m/CAFjFpRdBiQjZm8sG9+s0x8Re-afHds6MFLgGuw0wVUNLGrVOQg@mail.gmail.com
we don't have default-partition support with the hash partitioning
scheme. That seems a reasonable outcome, but I think we should have a
comment about it (I had to search the reason for this restriction in the
hash-partitioning patch set). How about the attached? Does anyone see
a reason to make this more verbose, and if so to what?
... unless somebody wants to argue that we should have the feature; if
so please share your patch.
Thanks
--
Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| 0001-Add-comment-on-no-default-partition-with-hash-partit.patch | text/x-diff | 909 bytes |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2019-08-06 22:36:38 | Re: no default hash partition |
| Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2019-08-06 22:17:59 | Re: Problem with default partition pruning |