On Thu, Aug 1, 2019 at 12:18:20PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> Hi Tom,
>
> b654714 has reworked the way we handle removal of CLRF for several
> code paths, and has repeated the same code patterns to do that in 8
> different places. Could it make sense to refactor things as per the
> attached with a new routine in common/string.c?
Yes, I think this is a good idea.
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
+ As you are, so once was I. As I am, so you will be. +
+ Ancient Roman grave inscription +