From: | Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Adrien Nayrat <adrien(dot)nayrat(at)anayrat(dot)info> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: idea: log_statement_sample_rate - bottom limit for sampling |
Date: | 2019-08-01 10:04:45 |
Message-ID: | 20190801100445.yo5v3pdxelijztzm@development |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Aug 01, 2019 at 11:47:46AM +0200, Adrien Nayrat wrote:
>Hi,
>
>As we are at the end of this CF and there is still discussions about whether we
>should revert log_statement_sample_limit and log_statement_sample_rate, or try
>to fix it in v12.
>I moved this patch to next commit fest and change status from "ready for
>commiter" to "need review". I hope I didn't make a mistake.
>
Thanks. The RFC status was clearly stale, so thanks for updating. I should
have done that after my review. I think the patch would be moved to the
next CF at the end, but I might be wrong. In any case, I don't think
you've done any mistake.
As for the sampling patch - I think we'll end up reverting the feature for
v12 - it's far too late to rework it at this point. Sorry about that, I
know it's not a warm feeling when you get something done, and then it gets
reverted on the last minute. :-(
regards
--
Tomas Vondra http://www.2ndQuadrant.com
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Sergei Kornilov | 2019-08-01 10:09:51 | Re: allow online change primary_conninfo |
Previous Message | Thomas Munro | 2019-08-01 10:03:51 | Re: \describe* |