Re: Problem with default partition pruning

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: yuzuko <yuzukohosoya(at)gmail(dot)com>, shawn wang <shawn(dot)wang(dot)pg(at)gmail(dot)com>, Shawn Wang <shawn(dot)wang(at)highgo(dot)ca>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Problem with default partition pruning
Date: 2019-07-31 12:48:58
Message-ID: 20190731124858.GA28454@alvherre.pgsql
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2019-Jul-31, Amit Langote wrote:

> Hello,
>
> I noticed that the patch is still marked as "Waiting on Author" ever
> since Shawn set it that way on June 17. Since Hosoya-san posted
> updated patches on June 27, the status should've been changed to
> "Needs Review". Or maybe "Ready for Committer", because the last time
> I looked, at least the default partition pruning issue seems to be
> sufficiently taken care of by the latest patch. Whether or not we
> should apply the other patch (more aggressive use of constraint
> exclusion by partprune.c on partitioned partitions), I'm not sure, but
> maybe a committer can decide in an instant. :)

Thanks for the status update. I intend to get this patch pushed before
the next set of minors.

--
Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Rafia Sabih 2019-07-31 12:54:31 Re: proposal - patch: psql - sort_by_size
Previous Message Etsuro Fujita 2019-07-31 12:03:58 Re: partition routing layering in nodeModifyTable.c