Re: Add parallelism and glibc dependent only options to reindexdb

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, Daniel Verite <daniel(at)manitou-mail(dot)org>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Kevin Grittner <kgrittn(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Add parallelism and glibc dependent only options to reindexdb
Date: 2019-07-28 07:28:13
Message-ID: 20190728072813.GB2029@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Jul 22, 2019 at 01:05:32PM -0400, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Fair enough. List has gotten quite sophisticated now, so I understand
> the concern.

Just wondering something... List cells include one pointer, one
signed integer and an OID. The two last entries are basically 4-byte
each, hence could we reduce a bit the bloat by unifying both of them?
I understand that the distinction exists because both may not be of
the same size..

/me runs and hides
--
Michael

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Fabien COELHO 2019-07-28 07:47:17 Re: LLVM compile failing in seawasp
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2019-07-28 07:23:02 Re: fsync error handling in pg_receivewal, pg_recvlogical