| From: | Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com>, Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Antonin Houska <ah(at)cybertec(dot)at>, Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Haribabu Kommi <kommi(dot)haribabu(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Moon, Insung" <Moon_Insung_i3(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, Ibrar Ahmed <ibrar(dot)ahmad(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [Proposal] Table-level Transparent Data Encryption (TDE) and Key Management Service (KMS) |
| Date: | 2019-07-25 19:41:05 |
| Message-ID: | 20190725194105.GN29202@tamriel.snowman.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Greetings,
* Bruce Momjian (bruce(at)momjian(dot)us) wrote:
> After talking to Joe Conway, I just want to mention that if we decide
> that the LSN is unique among heap and index, or among heap or index, we
> will need to make sure future WAL records retain this uniqueness.
One thing comes to mind regarding this and I'll admit that I don't quite
remember exactly off-hand but I also don't want to not mention it now
and forget to later.
What about pg_upgrade?
Thanks,
Stephen
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2019-07-25 19:43:34 | Re: [Proposal] Table-level Transparent Data Encryption (TDE) and Key Management Service (KMS) |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2019-07-25 18:59:01 | Re: [Proposal] Table-level Transparent Data Encryption (TDE) and Key Management Service (KMS) |