Re: A little report on informal commit tag usage

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: A little report on informal commit tag usage
Date: 2019-07-16 23:33:07
Message-ID: 20190716233307.3stvhji4zhuvw3sw@alap3.anarazel.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi,

On 2019-07-16 19:26:59 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> writes:
> > They don't preclude each other though. E.g. it'd be sensible to have both
>
> >> Per gripe from Ken Tanzer. Back-patch to 9.6. The issue exists
> >> further back, but before 9.6 the code looks very different and it
> >> doesn't actually know whether the "var" name matches anything,
> >> so I desisted from trying to fix it.
>
> > and "Backpatch: 9.6-" or such.
>
> I've wondered for some time what you think the "-" means in this.

Up to master. Occasionally there's bugs that only need to be fixed in
some back branches etc.

Greetings,

Andres Freund

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jerry Sievers 2019-07-16 23:33:36 Re: SegFault on 9.6.14
Previous Message Tom Lane 2019-07-16 23:26:59 Re: A little report on informal commit tag usage