| From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Hypothetical indexes using BRIN broken since pg10 |
| Date: | 2019-06-27 19:24:21 |
| Message-ID: | 20190627192420.GA1028@alvherre.pgsql |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2019-Jun-27, Tom Lane wrote:
> Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
> > On 2019-Jun-27, Tom Lane wrote:
> >> FWIW, the proposed patch doesn't seem to me like it adds much more
> >> BRIN-specific knowledge to brincostestimate than is there already.
>
> > It's this calculation that threw me off:
> > statsData.revmapNumPages = (indexRanges / REVMAP_PAGE_MAXITEMS) + 1;
> > ISTM that selfuncs has no reason to learn about revmap low-level
> > details.
>
> Um ... it's accounting for revmap pages already (which is why it needs
> this field set), so hasn't that ship sailed?
Yes, but does it need to know how many items there are in a revmap page?
--
Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2019-06-27 19:30:40 | Re: Hypothetical indexes using BRIN broken since pg10 |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2019-06-27 19:22:00 | Re: Hypothetical indexes using BRIN broken since pg10 |