From: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | John Naylor <john(dot)naylor(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: benchmarking Flex practices |
Date: | 2019-06-20 16:02:20 |
Message-ID: | 20190620160220.ewiayagre2gwqirw@alap3.anarazel.de |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi,
On 2019-06-20 10:52:54 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> John Naylor <john(dot)naylor(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
> > It would be nice to have confirmation to make sure I didn't err
> > somewhere, and to try a more real-world benchmark.
>
> I don't see much wrong with using information_schema.sql as a parser/lexer
> benchmark case. We should try to confirm the results on other platforms
> though.
Might be worth also testing with a more repetitive testcase to measure
both cache locality and branch prediction. I assume that with
information_schema there's enough variability that these effects play a
smaller role. And there's plenty real-world cases where there's a *lot*
of very similar statements being parsed over and over. I'd probably just
measure the statements pgbench generates or such.
Greetings,
Andres Freund
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Robert Haas | 2019-06-20 16:02:30 | Re: UCT (Re: pgsql: Update time zone data files to tzdata release 2019a.) |
Previous Message | Amit Kapila | 2019-06-20 15:35:33 | Re: POC: Cleaning up orphaned files using undo logs |