From: | David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
Cc: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, PostgreSQL Development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: New EXPLAIN option: ALL |
Date: | 2019-06-18 21:15:25 |
Message-ID: | 20190618211524.GA29683@fetter.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Jun 18, 2019 at 11:08:31PM +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On 2019-05-15 19:58, Andres Freund wrote:
> > On 2019-05-15 13:53:26 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> >> FWIW, given the conflict against "EXPLAIN EXECUTE prepared_stmt_name",
> >> we should probably just drop the whole idea. It seemed like a great
> >> idea at the time, but it's going to confuse people not just Bison.
> > I'm not particularly invested in the idea of renaming ANALYZE - but I
> > think we might be able to come up with something less ambiguous than
> > EXECUTE. Even EXECUTION might be better.
>
> The GQL draft uses PROFILE as a separate top-level command, so it would be
>
> PROFILE SELECT ...
>
> That seems nice and clear.
Are you proposing something along the lines of this?
PROFILE [statement]; /* Shows the plan */
PROFILE RUN [statement]; /* Actually executes the query */
Best,
David.
--
David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> http://fetter.org/
Phone: +1 415 235 3778
Remember to vote!
Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tomas Vondra | 2019-06-18 21:33:57 | Multivariate MCV list vs. statistics target |
Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2019-06-18 21:10:10 | Re: POC: Cleaning up orphaned files using undo logs |