From: | Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> |
Cc: | Ian Barwick <ian(dot)barwick(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [PATCH] Stop ALTER SYSTEM from making bad assumptions |
Date: | 2019-06-18 13:37:03 |
Message-ID: | 20190618133703.GM2480@tamriel.snowman.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Greetings,
* Magnus Hagander (magnus(at)hagander(dot)net) wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 17, 2019 at 5:41 PM Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> wrote:
> > I'd further say something along the lines of 'utilities should not
> > modify a postgresql.auto.conf that's in place under a running PostgreSQL
> > cluster'.
>
> Do we need to differ between "external" and "internal" utilities here?
I don't think so..? Is there something there that you're thinking would
be different between them?
> > I'd rather say that 'any duplicate items should be removed, and a
> > WARNING emitted when detected', or something along those lines. Same
> > for comment lines...
>
> I think it's perfectly fine to silently drop comments (other than the one
> at the very top which says don't touch this file).
I'm not sure why that's different? I don't really think that I agree
with you on this one- anything showing up in that file that we're ending
up removing must have gotten there because someone or something didn't
realize the rules around managing the file, and that's a problem...
Thanks,
Stephen
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Magnus Hagander | 2019-06-18 14:32:54 | Re: [PATCH] Stop ALTER SYSTEM from making bad assumptions |
Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2019-06-18 12:35:02 | fix "Success" error messages |