Re: Do we expect tests to work with default_transaction_isolation=serializable

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Do we expect tests to work with default_transaction_isolation=serializable
Date: 2019-06-17 07:19:01
Message-ID: 20190617071901.GD18917@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sat, Jun 15, 2019 at 11:47:39AM -0700, Noah Misch wrote:
> On Sun, May 19, 2019 at 03:55:06PM -0700, Andres Freund wrote:
>> Currently that's not the case. When running check-world with PGOPTIONS
>> set to -c default_transaction_isolation=serializable I get easy to fix
>> failures (isolation, plpgsql) but also some apparently hanging tests
>> (003_recovery_targets.pl, 003_standby_2.pl).

These sound strange and may point to actual bugs.

>> Do we expect this to work? If it's desirable I'll set up an animal that
>> forces it to on.
>
> I'm +1 for making it a project expectation, with an animal to confirm. It's
> not expected to work today.

+1.
--
Michael

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alexander Lakhin 2019-06-17 07:32:13 Re: Fix typos and inconsistencies for v11+
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2019-06-17 07:16:31 Re: Fix typos and inconsistencies for v11+