Re: pgsql: Avoid spurious deadlocks when upgrading a tuple lock

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Oleksii Kliukin <alexk(at)hintbits(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: pgsql: Avoid spurious deadlocks when upgrading a tuple lock
Date: 2019-06-17 02:44:20
Message-ID: 20190617024420.GA18917@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers

On Sun, Jun 16, 2019 at 10:27:25PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
>> On 2019-Jun-17, Michael Paquier wrote:
>>> Could you revert asap please then?
>
>> Done.
>
> Thanks.

Thanks, Alvaro.
--
Michael

In response to

Browse pgsql-committers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2019-06-17 07:15:24 pgsql: Fix more typos and inconsistencies in the tree
Previous Message Tom Lane 2019-06-17 02:27:25 Re: pgsql: Avoid spurious deadlocks when upgrading a tuple lock

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tsunakawa, Takayuki 2019-06-17 03:04:51 RE: Speed up transaction completion faster after many relations are accessed in a transaction
Previous Message Tom Lane 2019-06-17 02:27:25 Re: pgsql: Avoid spurious deadlocks when upgrading a tuple lock