From: | Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org, pg(at)bowt(dot)ie |
Subject: | Re: Draft back-branch release notes are up for review |
Date: | 2019-06-15 20:39:11 |
Message-ID: | 20190615203911.GA392396@rfd.leadboat.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Jun 14, 2019 at 04:58:47PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> https://git.postgresql.org/gitweb/?p=postgresql.git;a=commitdiff;h=0995cefa74510ee0e38d1bf095b2eef2c1ea37c4
> +<!--
> +Author: Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>
> +Branch: master [9b42e7137] 2019-05-13 10:27:59 -0700
> +Branch: REL_11_STABLE [bf78f50ba] 2019-05-13 10:27:57 -0700
> +-->
> + <para>
> + Avoid corruption of a btree index in the unlikely case that a failure
> + occurs during key truncation during a page split (Peter Geoghegan)
> + </para>
To me, this text implies a cautious DBA should amcheck every index. Reading
the thread[1], I no longer think that. It's enough to monitor that VACUUM
doesn't start failing persistently on any index. I suggest replacing this
release note text with something like the following:
Avoid writing erroneous btree index data that does not change query results
but causes VACUUM to abort with "failed to re-find parent key". Affected
indexes are rare; REINDEX fixes them.
(I removed "key truncation during a page split" as being too technical for
release notes.)
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Peter Geoghegan | 2019-06-15 21:11:41 | Re: Draft back-branch release notes are up for review |
Previous Message | Noah Misch | 2019-06-15 18:47:39 | Re: Do we expect tests to work with default_transaction_isolation=serializable |