Re: WITH NOT MATERIALIZED and DML CTEs

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Cc: Elvis Pranskevichus <elprans(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: WITH NOT MATERIALIZED and DML CTEs
Date: 2019-06-05 15:58:37
Message-ID: 20190605155837.GA7387@alvherre.pgsql
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2019-Jun-03, Andres Freund wrote:

> On 2019-06-03 11:45:51 -0400, Elvis Pranskevichus wrote:
> > It is understandably late in the 12 cycle, so maybe prohibit NOT
> > MATERIALIZED with DML altogheter and revisit this in 13?
>
> I could see us adding an error, or just continuing to silently ignore
> it.

Hmm, shouldn't we be throwing an error for that case? I'm not sure it's
defensible that we don't.

--
Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2019-06-05 16:01:45 Re: Binary support for pgoutput plugin
Previous Message Dave Cramer 2019-06-05 15:51:10 Re: Binary support for pgoutput plugin