| From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Subject: | Re: cpluspluscheck vs vpath |
| Date: | 2019-05-30 22:08:29 |
| Message-ID: | 20190530220829.GA28752@alvherre.pgsql |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2019-May-30, Andres Freund wrote:
> On 2019-05-30 15:02:44 -0700, Andres Freund wrote:
>
> > Seems we could round the edges a good bit further than what's done in
> > the attached (argument checking, for example, but also using the C++
> > compiler from configure). But I think this would already be an
> > improvement?
+1 I've stumbled upon this too.
--
Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Michael Paquier | 2019-05-30 22:15:15 | Re: incorrect xlog.c coverage report |
| Previous Message | Andres Freund | 2019-05-30 22:04:07 | Re: cpluspluscheck vs vpath |