Re: Why does pg_checksums -r not have a long option?

From:	Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To:	Fabien COELHO <coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr>
Cc:	Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject:	Re: Why does pg_checksums -r not have a long option?
Date:	2019-05-30 21:55:05
Message-ID:	20190530210030.GM2848@paquier.xyz
Views:	Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:	2019-05-26 06:12:30 from Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>  2019-05-26 06:35:30 from Fabien COELHO <coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr> 📎   2019-05-27 01:52:04 from Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>    2019-05-27 06:32:21 from Fabien COELHO <coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr> 📎     2019-05-27 08:33:30 from Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> 📎      2019-05-27 14:22:37 from Fabien COELHO <coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr>       2019-05-30 21:55:05 from Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>    2019-05-27 07:22:42 from Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>     2019-05-27 08:05:12 from Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>     2019-05-27 08:17:43 from Michael Banck <michael(dot)banck(at)credativ(dot)de>      2019-05-28 02:56:48 from Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>       2019-05-28 07:59:37 from Fabien COELHO <coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr>       2019-06-05 20:31:54 from Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>        2019-06-06 09:01:21 from Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>         2019-06-09 11:02:33 from Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Lists:	pgsql-hackers

In response to

• Re: Why does pg_checksums -r not have a long option? at 2019-05-27 14:22:37 from Fabien COELHO

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

	From	Date	Subject
Next Message	Michael Paquier	2019-05-30 21:55:47	Re: New committer: David Rowley
Previous Message	Michael Paquier	2019-05-30 21:54:36	Re: coverage additions