| From: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(dot)dunstan(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Teach pg_upgrade test to honor NO_TEMP_INSTALL |
| Date: | 2019-05-21 01:58:40 |
| Message-ID: | 20190521015840.cztw2qxthh7xuutk@alap3.anarazel.de |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi Andrew,
On 2019-03-30 16:42:16 -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> On some machines (*cough* Mingw *cough*) installs are very slow. We've
> ameliorated this by allowing temp installs to be reused, but the
> pg_upgrade Makefile never got the message. Here's a patch that does
> that. I'd like to backpatch it, at least to 9.5 where we switched the
> pg_upgrade location. The risk seems appropriately low and it only
> affects our test regime.
I'm confused as to why this was done as a purely optional path, rather
than just ripping out the pg_upgrade specific install?
See also discussion around https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/21766.1558397960%40sss.pgh.pa.us
Greetings,
Andres Freund
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2019-05-21 02:29:22 | Re: behaviour change - default_tablesapce + partition table |
| Previous Message | Peter Geoghegan | 2019-05-21 00:48:50 | Re: PG 12 draft release notes |