| From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Ashwin Agrawal <aagrawal(at)pivotal(dot)io>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie> |
| Subject: | Re: Adding a test for speculative insert abort case |
| Date: | 2019-05-17 17:30:28 |
| Message-ID: | 20190517173028.GA28896@alvherre.pgsql |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2019-May-17, Melanie Plageman wrote:
> I realized that the numbers at the front probably indicate which patch
> it is in a patch set and not the version, so, if that is the case, a
> renamed patch -- second version but the only patch needed if you are
> applying to master. Is this right?
That's correct. I suggest that "git format-patch -vN origin/master",
where the N is the version you're currently posting, generates good
patch files to attach in email.
--
Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2019-05-17 17:47:02 | Re: pgindent run next week? |
| Previous Message | Andres Freund | 2019-05-17 17:27:00 | Re: pgindent run next week? |