Re: PG12, PGXS and linking pgfeutils

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Ian Barwick <ian(dot)barwick(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: PG12, PGXS and linking pgfeutils
Date: 2019-05-09 17:39:11
Message-ID: 20190509173911.GA16616@alvherre.pgsql
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2019-May-09, Tom Lane wrote:

> I'm not especially on board with the idea of moving FE-specific error
> handling code into libpgcommon, as that breaks the concept that
> src/common/ is broadly for code that can work in either frontend or
> backend contexts. However, we already have a few violations of that
> rule: common/Makefile already has
>
> # A few files are currently only built for frontend, not server
> OBJS_FRONTEND = $(OBJS_COMMON) fe_memutils.o file_utils.o restricted_token.o
>
> So maybe the answer is to move these logging support functions into
> src/common, in a file that's only built for frontend.

I wonder if a better solution isn't to move the file_utils stuff to
fe_utils. Half of it is frontend-specific. The only one that should be
shared to backend seems to be fsync_fname ... but instead of sharing it,
we have a second copy in fd.c.

--
Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2019-05-09 17:42:34 Re: [Proposal] Table-level Transparent Data Encryption (TDE) and Key Management Service (KMS)
Previous Message Tom Lane 2019-05-09 17:20:53 Re: PG12, PGXS and linking pgfeutils