Re: make \d pg_toast.foo show its indices

From: Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Rafia Sabih <rafia(dot)pghackers(at)gmail(dot)com>, Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: make \d pg_toast.foo show its indices
Date: 2019-05-07 15:30:06
Message-ID: 20190507153006.GI6197@tamriel.snowman.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Greetings,

* Tom Lane (tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us) wrote:
> Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> writes:
> > * Tom Lane (tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us) wrote:
> >> Rafia Sabih <rafia(dot)pghackers(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> >>> IMHO, what makes more sense is to show the name of associated toast
> >>> table in the \dt+ of the normal table.
>
> >> I'm not for that: it's useless information in at least 99.44% of cases.
>
> > I don't think I'd put it in \dt+, but the toast table is still
> > pg_toast.pg_toast_{relOid}, right? What about showing the OID of the
> > table in the \d output, eg:
> > => \d comments
> > Table "public.comments" (50788)
>
> Not unless you want to break every regression test that uses \d.
> Instability of the output is also a reason not to show the
> toast table's name in the parent's \d[+].

So we need a way to turn it off. That doesn't seem like it'd be hard to
implement and the information is certainly quite useful.

Thanks,

Stephen

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2019-05-07 15:41:47 Re: New EXPLAIN option: ALL
Previous Message Tom Lane 2019-05-07 15:24:50 Re: make \d pg_toast.foo show its indices