| From: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>, David Rowley <david(dot)rowley(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Sergei Kornilov <sk(at)zsrv(dot)org>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Ildar Musin <i(dot)musin(at)postgrespro(dot)ru> |
| Subject: | Re: using index or check in ALTER TABLE SET NOT NULL |
| Date: | 2019-05-01 16:20:21 |
| Message-ID: | 20190501162021.q7r5cys6uwdb5bsp@alap3.anarazel.de |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2019-03-25 11:09:47 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 25, 2019 at 3:51 AM David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net> wrote:
> > On 3/17/19 3:40 PM, David Rowley wrote:
> > > On Thu, 14 Mar 2019 at 06:24, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > >
> > > I think we can mark this patch as committed now as I don't think the
> > > lack of a way to test it is likely to cause it to be reverted.
> >
> > Should we mark this as committed now or is there more tweaking to be done?
>
> I have now marked it as Committed.
There's still an open item "Debate INFO messages in ATTACH PARTITION and
SET NOT NULL" for this thread. Is there anything further to be done? Or
are we content with this for v12?
- Andres
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2019-05-01 16:20:22 | Re: REINDEX INDEX results in a crash for an index of pg_class since 9.6 |
| Previous Message | Andres Freund | 2019-05-01 16:18:02 | Re: compiler warning in pgcrypto imath.c |