Re: REINDEX INDEX results in a crash for an index of pg_class since 9.6

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: REINDEX INDEX results in a crash for an index of pg_class since 9.6
Date: 2019-04-29 22:09:24
Message-ID: 20190429220924.lfptluzkujb26y2n@alap3.anarazel.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi,

On 2019-04-29 18:07:07 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> I wrote:
> > Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> writes:
> >> Taking this as a WIP, what do you think?
>
> > Seems generally about right.
>
> Andres, are you pushing this forward? Next week's minor releases
> are coming up fast, and we're going to need to adapt the HEAD patch
> significantly for the back branches AFAICS. So there's little time
> to spare.

Yea. I'm testing the backbranch'd bits (much simpler) and writing the
commit message atm.

Greetings,

Andres Freund

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alexander Korotkov 2019-04-29 22:20:06 Re: jsonpath
Previous Message Tom Lane 2019-04-29 22:07:07 Re: REINDEX INDEX results in a crash for an index of pg_class since 9.6