Re: "Routine Reindexing" docs should be updated to reference REINDEX CONCURRENTLY

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Andreas Karlsson <andreas(at)proxel(dot)se>
Subject: Re: "Routine Reindexing" docs should be updated to reference REINDEX CONCURRENTLY
Date: 2019-04-27 00:07:30
Message-ID: 20190427000730.GA2032@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Apr 26, 2019 at 10:53:35AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> +1. Maybe say "... which requires only a
> <literal>SHARE UPDATE EXCLUSIVE</literal> lock."

Thanks for the review. Committed with your suggested change.
--
Michael

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Geoghegan 2019-04-27 00:13:53 Re: What is an item pointer, anyway?
Previous Message Tom Lane 2019-04-27 00:05:14 Re: What is an item pointer, anyway?