Re: finding changed blocks using WAL scanning

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: finding changed blocks using WAL scanning
Date: 2019-04-22 17:15:49
Message-ID: 20190422171549.kgaxb3m7stzragjh@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Apr 22, 2019 at 01:11:22PM -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 22, 2019 at 12:35 PM Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:
> > I assumed the modblock files would be stored in the WAL archive so some
> > external tools could generate incremental backups using just the WAL
> > files. I assumed they would also be sent to standby servers so
> > incremental backups could be done on standby servers too.
>
> Yeah, that's another possible approach. I am not sure what is best.

I am thinking you need to allow any of these, and putting the WAL files
in pg_wal and having them streamed and archived gives that flexibility.

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com

+ As you are, so once was I. As I am, so you will be. +
+ Ancient Roman grave inscription +

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Geoghegan 2019-04-22 17:16:16 Re: Thoughts on nbtree with logical/varwidth table identifiers, v12 on-disk representation
Previous Message Robert Haas 2019-04-22 17:11:22 Re: finding changed blocks using WAL scanning