Re: Adding a TAP test checking data consistency on standby with minRecoveryPoint

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>, Arthur Zakirov <a(dot)zakirov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, Georgios Kokolatos <gkokolatos(at)pm(dot)me>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Adding a TAP test checking data consistency on standby with minRecoveryPoint
Date: 2019-04-19 00:08:38
Message-ID: 20190419000838.GA2660@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Apr 18, 2019 at 03:16:17PM -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 16, 2019 at 2:45 AM Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> wrote:
>> I think that we have race conditions with checkpointing and shutdown
>> on HEAD.
>
> Any idea whether it's something newly-introduced or of long standing?

I would suggest to keep the discussion on the more general thread I
have created a couple of days ago:
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20190416070119.GK2673@paquier.xyz

Thanks,
--
Michael

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2019-04-19 00:27:07 Re: "make installcheck" fails in src/test/recovery
Previous Message Stephen Frost 2019-04-18 22:39:46 Re: block-level incremental backup