From: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
---|---|
To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
Cc: | cyberdemn(at)gmail(dot)com, pgsql-bugs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: BUG #15734: Walsender process crashing when executing SHOW ALL; |
Date: | 2019-04-15 03:39:06 |
Message-ID: | 20190415033906.GA3526@paquier.xyz |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
On Thu, Apr 11, 2019 at 12:07:12PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> What do you think about the set attached? I prefer that we use
> psql(on_error_die => 1) so as in the case of a crash or an error the
> test dies hard and fast. In consequence, I have granted
> pg_read_all_settings to the replication user to ensure that no errors
> happen, still the syscache lookup is done. We could have negative
> tests but I don't think that's worth the addition as we already have
> tests for pg_read_all_settings in src/test/regress/. If I remove the
> patched patch from walsender.c, the test fails immediately.
I have done another round of review of this patch and committed it
down to v10. When testing on Windows, I have noticed that these new
regression tests suffer the same problem with SSPI authentication as
the recent tweaks I have done for pg_rewind. So I have backpatched
the extension for PostgresNode::init done in d9f543e9 to be able to
add extra options for the authentication configuration so as the new
tests are able to work.
Thanks Alexander for the report!
--
Michael
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Sandeep Thakkar | 2019-04-15 03:49:21 | Re: Error occurred when i install in my pc. |
Previous Message | PG Bug reporting form | 2019-04-14 19:36:34 | BUG #15754: The CentOS RPM for PostgreSQL 11 disappeared and now throws a 404 error |