Re: BUG #15726: parallel queries failed ERROR: invalid name syntax CONTEXT: parallel worker

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, Daniel Gustafsson <dgustafsson(at)pivotal(dot)io>, ANASTACIO Tiago <tiago_anastacio(at)yahoo(dot)fr>, Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-bugs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: BUG #15726: parallel queries failed ERROR: invalid name syntax CONTEXT: parallel worker
Date: 2019-04-12 03:32:50
Message-ID: 20190412033250.GE2144@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs

On Thu, Apr 11, 2019 at 11:04:14AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> The extra appearance of "parallel worker" seems a bit redundant,
> though I don't know if we can get rid of it.
>
> Could we at least be consistent about whether the context is
> "parallel worker" or "parallel worker process"?

Indeed. My vote would be to back-patch that stuff.
--
Michael

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Thomas Munro 2019-04-12 05:04:53 Re: BUG #15727: PANIC: cannot abort transaction 295144144, it was already committed
Previous Message r.zharkov 2019-04-12 03:22:09 Re: BUG #15746: cache lookup failed for function in plpgsql block