Re: [PATCH v20] GSSAPI encryption support

From: Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Nico Williams <nico(at)cryptonector(dot)com>, Robbie Harwood <rharwood(at)redhat(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v20] GSSAPI encryption support
Date: 2019-04-09 02:51:14
Message-ID: 20190409025114.GW6197@tamriel.snowman.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Greetings,

* Peter Eisentraut (peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com) wrote:
> On 2019-04-05 23:37, Stephen Frost wrote:
> > I wonder if somehow the keytab file that the server is using isn't
> > getting destroyed between the two test runs and so you're ending up with
> > the server using the key from the old KDC, while the user is using the
> > new one..? Or something is equally going wrong in the tests.
> >
> > Could you try doing something like removing the 001_auth.pl, moving the
> > 002_enc.pl to 001_enc.pl, double-check that everything is cleaned up and
> > that there aren't any old PG servers running, et al, and re-try that
> > way?
>
> Running just 002_enc.pl by itself passes the tests!

Great! I think what I'll do is work to incorporate the two tests back
into one script, to avoid whatever the race condition or other confusion
is happening on macOS here.

Thanks so much for testing it!

Stephen

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Amit Langote 2019-04-09 03:18:55 Re: COLLATE: Hash partition vs UPDATE
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2019-04-09 02:29:18 Re: [HACKERS] PATCH: multivariate histograms and MCV lists