Re: Planning performance problem (67626.278ms)

From: Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com>
To: Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Krzysztof Plocharz <plocharz(at)9livesdata(dot)com>, "pgsql-performance(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-performance(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Planning performance problem (67626.278ms)
Date: 2019-04-08 14:42:10
Message-ID: 20190408144210.GG10080@telsasoft.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

On Mon, Apr 08, 2019 at 04:33:34PM +0200, Pavel Stehule wrote:
> po 8. 4. 2019 v 16:11 odesílatel Krzysztof Plocharz <plocharz(at)9livesdata(dot)com> napsal:
>
> > We have some very strange query planning problem. Long story short it
> > takes 67626.278ms just to plan. Query execution takes 12ms.
> >
> > Query has 7 joins and 2 subselects.
> > It looks like the issue is not deterministic, sometimes is takes few ms
> > to plan the query.
> >
> > One of the tables has 550,485,942 live tuples and 743,504,012 dead
> > tuples. Running ANALYZE on that tables solves the problem only temporarily.
> >
> > Question is how can we debug what is going on?
>
> please check your indexes against bloating. Planner get min and max from
> indexes and this operation is slow on bloat indexes.

I think that's from get_actual_variable_range(), right ?

If it's due to bloating, I think the first step would be to 1) vacuum right
now; and, 2) set more aggressive auto-vacuum, like ALTER TABLE t SET
(AUTOVACUUM_VACUUM_SCALE_FACTOR=0.005).

What version postgres server ?

Justin

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Krzysztof Plocharz 2019-04-08 14:55:36 Re: Planning performance problem (67626.278ms)
Previous Message Pavel Stehule 2019-04-08 14:33:34 Re: Planning performance problem (67626.278ms)