From: | Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
Cc: | Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi(dot)kyotaro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, mathias(at)brossard(dot)org, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: ToDo: show size of partitioned table |
Date: | 2019-04-07 21:25:25 |
Message-ID: | 20190407212525.GB10080@telsasoft.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Sun, Apr 07, 2019 at 03:13:36PM -0400, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> On 2019-Apr-07, Pavel Stehule wrote:
>
> > ne 7. 4. 2019 v 20:27 odesílatel Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
> > napsal:
>
> > > In order for this to display sanely, I added the "Parent name" column if
> > > either the "n" flag is shown or a pattern is given (previously it only
> > > appeared in the former case).
> >
> > I am thinking about it and original behave and this new behave should be
> > expected (and unexpected too). We can go this way - I have not
> > counter-arguments, but yes, it is more consistent with some other commands,
> > pattern disables some other constraints.
> >
> > It should be documented - Using any pattern in this case forces 'n' flag.
>
> Added to the docs, and pushed.
Thanks for helping it across the finish line.
I see you changed from relname to oid::regclass, which is good, thanks.
Then, it's unnecessary to join against pg_class again (and I don't know why
it was a left join) ?
Also docs are wrong re: indices.
Justin
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Justin Pryzby | 2019-04-07 21:28:29 | Re: ToDo: show size of partitioned table |
Previous Message | Andres Freund | 2019-04-07 20:29:11 | What is the correct behaviour for a wCTE UPDATE followed by a DELETE? |