From: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
---|---|
To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
Cc: | Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com>, Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Sergei Kornilov <sk(at)zsrv(dot)org>, Jaime Casanova <jaime(dot)casanova(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] generated columns |
Date: | 2019-04-02 02:20:28 |
Message-ID: | 20190402022028.GK16093@paquier.xyz |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Apr 01, 2019 at 10:44:05PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> Really? I thought on the contrary that it should work. This reminds
> me of commit 59a884e9, which has been discussed here:
> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20160212001846.GB29511@momjian.us
And this remark makes little sense as we are taking about incompatible
dump formats with pg_dump. My apologies for the useless noise.
/me runs fast and hides, fast.
--
Michael
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Masahiko Sawada | 2019-04-02 02:37:56 | Re: Re: A separate table level option to control compression |
Previous Message | Michael Paquier | 2019-04-02 02:13:57 | Re: Progress reporting for pg_verify_checksums |