Re: Progress reporting for pg_verify_checksums

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Michael Banck <michael(dot)banck(at)credativ(dot)de>
Cc: Fabien COELHO <coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr>, Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi(dot)kyotaro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com, mailings(at)oopsware(dot)de, thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Progress reporting for pg_verify_checksums
Date: 2019-04-02 02:05:56
Message-ID: 20190402020556.GI16093@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Apr 01, 2019 at 08:51:03PM +0200, Michael Banck wrote:
> I had another look and I don't see any slowdown with your patch.

I noticed one slowdown when using --disable --progress as this was
scanning the data directory for the total size but we don't need it in
this case. Fixed that and committed.
--
Michael

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2019-04-02 02:13:57 Re: Progress reporting for pg_verify_checksums
Previous Message Thomas Munro 2019-04-02 01:48:01 Re: patch to allow disable of WAL recycling