From: | Christoph Berg <myon(at)debian(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | rajdeep limbu <rajdeep(dot)limbu(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-pkg-yum(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: PostgreSQL Packages |
Date: | 2019-03-29 12:09:54 |
Message-ID: | 20190329120954.GF20294@msg.df7cb.de |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-pkg-yum |
Re: rajdeep limbu 2019-03-29 <CAG5O28cyU64zRhooQLovVzci0QNnsZfjQh=z_LV1eKFOkRsVPQ(at)mail(dot)gmail(dot)com>
> Apart from this, I had a query regarding the naming convention followed by
> PostgreSQL for their *client* and *server *packages. For all the server
> installations, they call it PostgreSQL Server. However, for the client
> related installations,
"client" is the "psql" command line client, and other binaries like
pg_dump.
> they nowhere mention that it is a PostgreSQL client rather they say it as
> PostgreSQL ( at least for CentOS). what about Ubuntu, Debian, and other
> installations? Can you throw some light on this ??
On CentOS, the postgresql package has the clients, and the server is
in the postgresql-server package.
On Debian, the postgresql package has the server, and the clients are
in the postgresql-client package.
I'm not sure I got your questions correctly. What's the reason you are
asking?
Christoph
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | rajdeep limbu | 2019-03-29 13:16:40 | Re: PostgreSQL Packages |
Previous Message | rajdeep limbu | 2019-03-29 09:52:26 | PostgreSQL Packages |