From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
Cc: | "Fred (dot)Flintstone" <eldmannen(at)gmail(dot)com>, Mark Kirkwood <mark(dot)kirkwood(at)catalyst(dot)net(dot)nz>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Andreas Karlsson <andreas(at)proxel(dot)se>, Chris Travers <chris(dot)travers(at)adjust(dot)com>, Tatsuo Ishii <ishii(at)sraoss(dot)co(dot)jp>, Euler Taveira <euler(at)timbira(dot)com(dot)br>, Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123(at)gmail(dot)com>, Postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: PostgreSQL pollutes the file system |
Date: | 2019-03-27 14:00:18 |
Message-ID: | 20190327140018.GA15038@alvherre.pgsql |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-pkg-debian |
On 2019-Mar-27, Tomas Vondra wrote:
> I think the consensus in this thread (and the previous ancient ones) is
> that it's not worth it. It's one thing to introduce new commands with the
> pg_ prefix, and it's a completely different thing to rename existing ones.
> That has inherent costs, and as Tom pointed out the burden would fall on
> people using PostgreSQL (and that's rather undesirable).
I thought the consensus was to rename them, and install symlinks to the
old names.
--
Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andreas Karlsson | 2019-03-27 14:07:24 | Re: PostgreSQL pollutes the file system |
Previous Message | Fred .Flintstone | 2019-03-27 13:57:03 | Re: PostgreSQL pollutes the file system |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andreas Karlsson | 2019-03-27 14:07:24 | Re: PostgreSQL pollutes the file system |
Previous Message | Fred .Flintstone | 2019-03-27 13:57:03 | Re: PostgreSQL pollutes the file system |