Re: Special role for subscriptions

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>
Cc: Petr Jelinek <petr(dot)jelinek(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Andrey Borodin <x4mmm(at)yandex-team(dot)ru>, Euler Taveira <euler(at)timbira(dot)com(dot)br>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Evgeniy Efimkin <efimkin(at)yandex-team(dot)ru>, Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Дмитрий Сарафанников <dsarafan(at)yandex-team(dot)ru>, Владимир Бородин <root(at)simply(dot)name>
Subject: Re: Special role for subscriptions
Date: 2019-03-26 02:29:30
Message-ID: 20190326022930.GQ2558@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sat, Mar 23, 2019 at 10:52:52AM -0400, Stephen Frost wrote:
> * Petr Jelinek (petr(dot)jelinek(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com) wrote:
>> I agree the feature is important, it just does not seem like the patch
>> is RFC and given security implications I err on the side of safety here.
>
> Agreed.

Based on the latest exchanges, I am marking the patch as returned with
feedback.
--
Michael

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2019-03-26 02:35:10 Re: REINDEX CONCURRENTLY 2.0
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2019-03-26 02:26:58 Re: pg_basebackup ignores the existing data directory permissions