Re: Offline enabling/disabling of data checksums

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Michael Banck <michael(dot)banck(at)credativ(dot)de>
Cc: Fabien COELHO <coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Sergei Kornilov <sk(at)zsrv(dot)org>, PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Offline enabling/disabling of data checksums
Date: 2019-03-22 08:37:16
Message-ID: 20190322083716.GX20192@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Mar 22, 2019 at 09:13:43AM +0100, Michael Banck wrote:
> Don't we need a big warning that the cluster must not be started during
> operation of pg_checksums as well, now that we don't disallow it?

The same applies to pg_rewind and pg_basebackup, so I would classify
that as a pilot error. How would you formulate that in the docs if
you add it.
--
Michael

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Banck 2019-03-22 09:04:02 Re: Offline enabling/disabling of data checksums
Previous Message Shaoqi Bai 2019-03-22 08:25:53 Re: Fwd: Add tablespace tap test to pg_rewind