From: | Tatsuo Ishii <ishii(at)sraoss(dot)co(dot)jp> |
---|---|
To: | tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com |
Cc: | alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com, euler(at)timbira(dot)com(dot)br, tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us, rjuju123(at)gmail(dot)com, ishii(at)sraoss(dot)co(dot)jp, chris(dot)travers(at)adjust(dot)com, andreas(at)proxel(dot)se, eldmannen(at)gmail(dot)com, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: PostgreSQL pollutes the file system |
Date: | 2019-03-20 23:41:32 |
Message-ID: | 20190321.084132.2186284141219540889.t-ishii@sraoss.co.jp |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-pkg-debian |
> I don't really understand what issue are we trying to solve here.
>
> Can someone describe a scenario where this (name of the binary not
> clearly indicating it's related postgres) causes issues in practice? On
> my system, there are ~1400 binaries in /usr/bin, and for the vast
> majority of them it's rather unclear where do they come from.
>
> But it's not really an issue, because we have tools to do that
>
> 1) man
>
> 2) -h/--help
>
> 3) rpm -qf $file (and similarly for other packagers)
>
> 4) set --prefix to install binaries so separate directory (which some
> distros already do anyway)
>
> So to me this seems like a fairly invasive change (potentially breaking
> quite a few scripts/tools) just to address a minor inconvenience.
+1.
Best regards,
--
Tatsuo Ishii
SRA OSS, Inc. Japan
English: http://www.sraoss.co.jp/index_en.php
Japanese:http://www.sraoss.co.jp
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | PG Bug reporting form | 2019-03-20 23:53:56 | BUG #15708: RLS 'using' running as wrong user when called from a view |
Previous Message | Michael Paquier | 2019-03-20 22:59:24 | Re: Offline enabling/disabling of data checksums |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Michael Paquier | 2019-03-21 00:49:19 | Re: PostgreSQL pollutes the file system |
Previous Message | Tatsuo Ishii | 2019-03-20 22:56:59 | Re: PostgreSQL pollutes the file system |