From: | Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi(dot)kyotaro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> |
---|---|
To: | coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr |
Cc: | michael(dot)banck(at)credativ(dot)de, michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz, alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com, mailings(at)oopsware(dot)de, thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Progress reporting for pg_verify_checksums |
Date: | 2019-03-19 00:04:14 |
Message-ID: | 20190319.090414.137724997.horiguchi.kyotaro@lab.ntt.co.jp |
Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hello.
At Mon, 18 Mar 2019 23:14:01 +0100 (CET), Fabien COELHO <coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr> wrote in <alpine(dot)DEB(dot)2(dot)21(dot)1903182311130(dot)23282(at)lancre>
>
> > I have rebased it now.
>
> Thanks. Will look at it.
>
> >> If the all of aboves are involved, the line would look as the
> >> follows.
> >>
> >> [======================= ] ( 63% of 12.53 GB, 179 MB/s,
> >> ETC 26s)
> >>
> >> # Note that this is just an opinion.
> >>
> >> (pg_checksum runs fast at the beginning so ETC behaves somewhat
> >> strange in the meanwhile.)
> >
> > I haven't changed that for now as it seems to be a bit more involved.
> > I'd like to hear other opinions on whether that is worthwhile?
> I think that the bar is overkill, but ETC is easy and nice.
I'm fine with that.
> >>> + /* we handle SIGUSR1 only, and toggle the value of show_progress
> >>> */
> >>> + if (signum == SIGUSR1)
> >>> + show_progress = !show_progress;
> >>
> >> SIGUSR1 *toggles* progress.
> >
> > Not sure what you mean here,
>
> Probably it is meant to simplify the comment?
Sorry. I meant that "it can be turned off and a perhaps-garbage
line is left alone after turning off. Don't we need to erase it?".
regards.
--
Kyotaro Horiguchi
NTT Open Source Software Center
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Peter Geoghegan | 2019-03-19 00:12:19 | Re: Making all nbtree entries unique by having heap TIDs participate in comparisons |
Previous Message | Matheus de Oliveira | 2019-03-19 00:04:07 | Re: [PATCH] Add support for ON UPDATE/DELETE actions on ALTER CONSTRAINT |