From: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
---|---|
To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: hyrax vs. RelationBuildPartitionDesc |
Date: | 2019-03-13 20:56:56 |
Message-ID: | 20190313205656.6eqpqua5vn4nf34d@alap3.anarazel.de |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi,
On 2019-03-13 16:50:53 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 13, 2019 at 4:38 PM Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 13, 2019 at 4:18 PM Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> > > Off topic for the moment, since this clearly wouldn't be back-patch
> > > material, but I'm starting to wonder if we should just have a context
> > > for each relcache entry and get rid of most or all of the retail
> > > cleanup logic in RelationDestroyRelation ...
> >
> > I think that idea might have a lot of merit, but I haven't studied it closely.
>
> It just occurred to me that one advantage of this would be that you
> could see how much memory was being used by each relcache entry using
> MemoryContextStats(), which seems super-appealing. In fact, what
> about getting rid of all allocations in CacheMemoryContext itself in
> favor of some more specific context in each case? That would make it
> a lot clearer where to look for leaks -- or efficiencies.
But it might also make it frustrating to look at memory context dumps -
we'd suddenly have many many more memory context lines we'd displayed,
right? Wouldn't that often make the dump extremely long?
To be clear, I think the idea has merit. Just want to raise the above
point.
Greetings,
Andres Freund
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2019-03-13 21:10:55 | Re: hyrax vs. RelationBuildPartitionDesc |
Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2019-03-13 20:50:53 | Re: hyrax vs. RelationBuildPartitionDesc |