| From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Rahila Syed <rahila(dot)syed(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: monitoring CREATE INDEX [CONCURRENTLY] |
| Date: | 2019-03-11 19:43:22 |
| Message-ID: | 20190311194322.GA30783@alvherre.pgsql |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2019-Mar-11, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 11, 2019 at 3:26 PM Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> > Oh. That's easily removed. Though I have to say that other people said
> > that they liked it so much that they would have liked to have it in the
> > original VACUUM one too (5ba2b281-9c84-772a-cf37-17780d782936(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp).
>
> Huh. Well, that's another option, but then what do we do if the
> number of phases is not a constant?
Well, why do we care? "Some phases might be skipped".
--
Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Pavel Stehule | 2019-03-11 19:47:12 | Re: proposal: variadic argument support for least, greatest function |
| Previous Message | Andres Freund | 2019-03-11 19:37:46 | Re: Pluggable Storage - Andres's take |