Re: partitioned tables referenced by FKs

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>
Cc: Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: partitioned tables referenced by FKs
Date: 2019-02-28 18:28:04
Message-ID: 20190228182804.GA24555@alvherre.pgsql
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2019-Feb-28, Amit Langote wrote:

> Hi Alvaro,
>
> I looked at the latest patch and most of the issues/bugs that I was going
> to report based on the late January version of the patch seem to have been
> taken care of; sorry that I couldn't post sooner which would've saved you
> some time. The patch needs to be rebased on top of ff11e7f4b9 which
> touched ri_triggers.c.

Rebased to current master. I'll reply later to handle the other issues
you point out.

Given the comments on 0002 in this thread and elsewhere, I'm inclined to
push that one today with minor tweaks.

--
Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

Attachment Content-Type Size
v5-0001-Rework-deleteObjectsInList-to-allow-objtype-speci.patch text/x-diff 2.2 KB
v5-0002-index_get_partition.patch text/x-diff 4.2 KB
v5-0003-support-FKs-referencing-partitioned-tables.patch text/x-diff 79.2 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Perumal Raj 2019-02-28 18:29:25 Re: Question about pg_upgrade from 9.2 to X.X
Previous Message Sergei Kornilov 2019-02-28 18:27:28 Re: Question about pg_upgrade from 9.2 to X.X