| From: | Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Mark Kirkwood <mark(dot)kirkwood(at)catalyst(dot)net(dot)nz> |
| Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Adrien NAYRAT <adrien(dot)nayrat(at)anayrat(dot)info>, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Remove Deprecated Exclusive Backup Mode |
| Date: | 2019-02-26 04:41:28 |
| Message-ID: | 20190226044128.GI6197@tamriel.snowman.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Greetings Mark,
* Mark Kirkwood (mark(dot)kirkwood(at)catalyst(dot)net(dot)nz) wrote:
> ISTM that the onus should be on the patch submitter to provide additions to
> pg_basebackup that make it as painless as possible for those people *not*
> using pgBackRest to continue making backups. Breaking this is just not
> right. Submitting patches that mean that people *must* use pgBackRest is
> also not right IMHO.
I'm sorry that there's some confusion here- to be clear, no one is
required to use pgBackRest. pg_basebackup works quite well and wouldn't
be impacted by the changes proposed no this thread. The arguments
against removing the exclusive backup feature don't have anything to do
with pg_basebackup.
Thanks!
Stephen
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Michael Paquier | 2019-02-26 04:51:07 | Re: Remove Deprecated Exclusive Backup Mode |
| Previous Message | Mark Kirkwood | 2019-02-26 04:38:41 | Re: Remove Deprecated Exclusive Backup Mode |