Re: Remove Deprecated Exclusive Backup Mode

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
To: David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>
Cc: Christophe Pettus <xof(at)thebuild(dot)com>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Remove Deprecated Exclusive Backup Mode
Date: 2019-02-25 21:15:53
Message-ID: 20190225211553.qj6om7prjgzybiaq@alap3.anarazel.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi,

On 2019-02-25 20:43:01 +0200, David Steele wrote:
> fsync() is the major corruption issue we are facing right now but that
> doesn't mean there aren't other sources of corruption we should be thinking
> about. I've thought about this one a lot and it scares me.

FWIW, I think this kind of issue practially bites a *LOT* more people
than the fsync() issue.

> I've worked on ways to make it better, but all of them break something and
> involve compromises that are nearly as severe as removing exclusive backups
> entirely.

There've been plenty proposals to make non-exclusive backups less
painful in this thread, so ...?

Greetings,

Andres Freund

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Christophe Pettus 2019-02-25 21:20:21 Re: Remove Deprecated Exclusive Backup Mode
Previous Message Andres Freund 2019-02-25 21:14:17 Re: Remove Deprecated Exclusive Backup Mode