Re: Autovaccuum vs temp tables crash

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Autovaccuum vs temp tables crash
Date: 2019-02-23 23:13:34
Message-ID: 20190223231334.GF8725@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sat, Feb 23, 2019 at 04:29:24PM +0100, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 23, 2019 at 4:18 PM Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> wrote:
>> Perhaps I am missing something, but it would be just more simple to
>> now allow users to restrict that?
>>
>
> I can't parse what you are saying here. Now allow users to restrict
> what?

Second try after some sleep:
"Perhaps I am missing something, but it would be just more simple to
now allow users to drop it?"
--
Michael

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Corey Huinker 2019-02-23 23:34:32 Re: some ri_triggers.c cleanup
Previous Message Tomas Vondra 2019-02-23 23:06:07 Re: explain plans with information about (modified) gucs