Re: Fixing findDependentObjects()'s dependency on scan order (regressions in DROP diagnostic messages)

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Fixing findDependentObjects()'s dependency on scan order (regressions in DROP diagnostic messages)
Date: 2019-02-10 20:47:56
Message-ID: 20190210204756.GA10790@alvherre.pgsql
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2019-Feb-10, Tom Lane wrote:

> Primary and secondary partition dependencies behave identically
> except that the primary dependency is preferred for use in error
> messages; hence, a partition-dependent object should have one
> primary partition dependency and one or more secondary partition
> dependencies.

Hmm, zero or more secondary partition dependencies?

--
Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2019-02-10 20:51:36 Re: Fixing findDependentObjects()'s dependency on scan order (regressions in DROP diagnostic messages)
Previous Message Thomas Munro 2019-02-10 20:44:01 Re: BUG #15548: Unaccent does not remove combining diacritical characters