| From: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Nathan Wagner <nw+pg(at)hydaspes(dot)if(dot)org>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: bug tracking system |
| Date: | 2019-02-07 04:17:53 |
| Message-ID: | 20190207041753.GJ4074@paquier.xyz |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Feb 06, 2019 at 10:50:51PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> I do have a modest proposal for improving things going forward.
> How about, if a commit purports to fix a particular bug, that
> we say "Fixes: https://postgr.es/m/<message-id>" in place of
> our current habit of saying "Discussion: ...". For bugs that
> have come in through the bug form, the bug number is trivially
> extractable from the message-id these days; but this method
> works for any mailing list report, not just those.
Wouldn't it be the same as making the effort to have a proper
"Reported-by" field for each actual bug fix then? We already
have that attached to some of the commit logs for bug fixes. I
personally try to follow that pattern.
--
Michael
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Amit Langote | 2019-02-07 04:34:15 | Re: Add pg_partition_root to get top-most parent of a partition tree |
| Previous Message | Michael Paquier | 2019-02-07 04:12:23 | Re: Inconsistent error handling in the openssl init code |