From: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
---|---|
To: | Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se> |
Cc: | David Rowley <david(dot)rowley(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Tighten up a few overly lax regexes in pg_dump's tap tests |
Date: | 2019-02-06 11:37:56 |
Message-ID: | 20190206113756.GD14980@paquier.xyz |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Feb 06, 2019 at 10:50:27AM +0100, Daniel Gustafsson wrote:
> I still think we should enforce one-or-more matching on the OWNER part as well,
> since matching zero would be a syntax error. There are more .* matches but
> I’ve only touched the ones which match SQL, since there is a defined grammar to
> rely on there. The attached patch does that on top of your commit.
- regexp => qr/^COMMENT ON DATABASE postgres IS .*;/m,
+ regexp => qr/^COMMENT ON DATABASE postgres IS .+;/m,
So... With what's on HEAD the current regex means that all these are
correct commands:
COMMENT ON DATABASE postgres is ;
COMMENT ON DATABASE postgres is foo;
COMMENT ON DATABASE postgres is foo;
And for the first one that's obviously wrong.
So what you are suggesting is to actually make the first pattern
something to complain about, right? And ".+" this makes sure that at
least one character is present, while for ".*" it is fine to have zero
characters. What you are suggesting looks right if I understood that
right.
--
Michael
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andres Freund | 2019-02-06 11:39:19 | Re: fast defaults in heap_getattr vs heap_deform_tuple |
Previous Message | David Rowley | 2019-02-06 11:29:13 | Re: Tighten up a few overly lax regexes in pg_dump's tap tests |