Re: Tighten up a few overly lax regexes in pg_dump's tap tests

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>
Cc: David Rowley <david(dot)rowley(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Tighten up a few overly lax regexes in pg_dump's tap tests
Date: 2019-02-06 11:37:56
Message-ID: 20190206113756.GD14980@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Feb 06, 2019 at 10:50:27AM +0100, Daniel Gustafsson wrote:
> I still think we should enforce one-or-more matching on the OWNER part as well,
> since matching zero would be a syntax error. There are more .* matches but
> I’ve only touched the ones which match SQL, since there is a defined grammar to
> rely on there. The attached patch does that on top of your commit.

- regexp => qr/^COMMENT ON DATABASE postgres IS .*;/m,
+ regexp => qr/^COMMENT ON DATABASE postgres IS .+;/m,
So... With what's on HEAD the current regex means that all these are
correct commands:
COMMENT ON DATABASE postgres is ;
COMMENT ON DATABASE postgres is foo;
COMMENT ON DATABASE postgres is foo;
And for the first one that's obviously wrong.

So what you are suggesting is to actually make the first pattern
something to complain about, right? And ".+" this makes sure that at
least one character is present, while for ".*" it is fine to have zero
characters. What you are suggesting looks right if I understood that
right.
--
Michael

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2019-02-06 11:39:19 Re: fast defaults in heap_getattr vs heap_deform_tuple
Previous Message David Rowley 2019-02-06 11:29:13 Re: Tighten up a few overly lax regexes in pg_dump's tap tests