| From: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
|---|---|
| To: | Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Dmitry Dolgov <9erthalion6(at)gmail(dot)com>, Kevin Grittner <kgrittn(at)gmail(dot)com>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] SERIALIZABLE on standby servers |
| Date: | 2019-02-04 06:19:10 |
| Message-ID: | 20190204061910.GI4092@paquier.xyz |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Dec 28, 2018 at 02:21:44PM +1300, Thomas Munro wrote:
> Just to be clear, although this patch is registered in the commitfest
> and currently applies and tests pass, it is prototype/WIP code with
> significant problems that remain to be resolved. I sort of wish there
> were a way to indicate that in the CF but since there isn't, I'm
> saying that here. What I hope to get from Kevin, Simon or other
> reviewers is some feedback on the general approach and problems
> discussed upthread (and other problems and better ideas I might have
> missed). So it's not seriously proposed for commit in this CF.
No feedback has actually come, so I have moved it to next CF.
--
Michael
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Michael Paquier | 2019-02-04 06:21:46 | Re: [HACKERS] Can ICU be used for a database's default sort order? |
| Previous Message | Michael Paquier | 2019-02-04 06:17:45 | Re: partitioned tables referenced by FKs |